🔗 Share this article

The Life Cycle of a Phenomenon tends to be characterized by clear stages.

1. The Big Idea

An inspiring figure or figureheads propose a new and transcendent idea offering a solution for alienated and vulnerable people.

So here we are. Plans are in motion to storm the compound overseas. The gunships are circling. Conflict emerges from within. A lone figure, naked, anxious, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT written on his body in chicken blood, has come staggering through the lines and is being led away with discretion to a different team at Derbyshire.

Remember the start, when optimism reigned? The days of Bazball 1.0, of uninhibited aggression.

2. The Honeymoon Phase

Team architects promise a reboot, hope for a future, love, redemption among a group united in belief in the big idea.

What was this thing back then? A team united enjoying success. Tattoos. Muscles. Jawlines. Peak performance vibes. Of course, England’s players often say it’s not a real term, amusingly as it’s denied, what was that spectacle?

But we know the concept. It’s the player attempting a move so outrageous it’s beyond belief. It’s the excitement of Ben Stokes in ultimate mode, a demeanor suggesting: focused titan, rugged appearance, untamed style, so authentically Modern Savage you wouldn’t be surprised to glance over and see him playing at mid-off bare-chested embracing nature.

It’s the batsman still being allowed speaking publicly, out there looking like a cheerful animal in a waistcoat, uttering phrases such as we’re breaking down traditions. And yes, the atmosphere, initially, was uplifting.

3. A New Life

Growth phase. Togetherness strengthened via memorization of mantras. These ideas may seem irrational to prove commitment.

Am I alone? The criticism, the fury, the disappointment post-defeat seems too strong, overdone. The batting collapsed on the field, as they often do in Australia. They were dominated in the field during a brief period when tactics failed, outplayed by the opponent imitating their style effectively, responsive to the situation, an athlete shining with brilliance.

Now there is the attacks, the rage, the sense of English Test cricket as a disgrace. The opinion suggests that defeat must be total, they need to lose righteously, to be cleansed, destroyed, defeated by the vengeful purity of the bowler’s action, the low-fi orthodoxies of Scott Boland, marking successes humbly like he’s just been given a nice new fishing rod. How will they respond?

4. External Conflict

Problems arise due to setbacks. However, faults are ignored. It starts to feed on hatred of the outside world.

The fact remains, a few days before from the second Test, we’ve entered a delicious point of tension in the journey of this thing. Victory is possible overseas through aggressive play. More likely, they could lose just as quickly. And if they do lose it appears we may see the decline.

Prior to that, several aspects to note on the topic. More than two years ago, at the start, of optimism and energy, I wrote an article suggesting Bazball was a cult. There was outrage, which demonstrated because everyone knows a method to show lack of cult status is should followers respond with anger objecting to the questioning of the beliefs.

Recent events lately are equally notable. Criticism of the approach has now become the cult. Online outrage is widespread, angry English pundits, images of frustrated supporters abroad disappointed by the short match, reminiscent of timeshare owners seeking justice.

On the other hand, exists the larger scene of the opponent’s mixed deep-seated frustration at these weirdly passive-aggressive buccaneers, stating, the methods you value and have fostered and nurtured to distinguish yourselves from the opposition, it’s just a joke after all.

And this is the real point. Everything is a cult. Bazball was a cult as the game has its own culture. Or rather, English cricket has always been a cult, a circle, an elite gathering, an insular community with centuries of tradition and mystery behind it. It has long been where entry is limited. It’s the imperial sport of England, the early image-makers. And guess what, Britain is itself a cult, a series of esoteric hierarchies, a royal family remains.

The team have been isolated in this environment from a young age. Attempting to break free, to create a less brutal environment, they are just repeating their own experience, building another enclosure, a limited community, but now with a new team and a coach promoting authenticity if you fit the mold.

Focus on the moment. Confront risks. Despite efforts, you’re always basically in the same place.

Reflecting on this, it is perhaps the moment to have some sympathy for the approach, to acknowledge its merits, that are numerous. What does it represent? Creating a sense of freedom. Questioning traditions. Batting aggressively|Attacking with